S&P/BMV IPC Downtrend Replay (2011-07-04 to 2011-08-08)
Replay Mexico's IPC correction spanning 2011-06-14 to 2011-08-24, a 52-bar slide where the index fell 2.3% amid a 13.9% drawdown. Step through each daily decision point, navigate 3 critical turning points, and receive an AI coach review of your choices in this simulated training exercise.
52 daily bars · 9 decision points · 2011-06 to 2011-08 · Stocks
Key facts
This window spans 71 days with a peak-to-trough drawdown of 13.9% and a 9.2% run-up.
- Max drawdown
- −13.9%
- Max run-up
- +9.2%
- Duration
- 71 days
- Largest single-day move
- −5.8%
- Bars
- 52 Daily bars
- Decision points
- 9
Every figure above is computed programmatically from this replay’s own candle series — no editorial input, no LLM. Methodology: Methodology
The market advances day by day. You only see candles up to the current day — as if you were really there.
At key decision points choose Buy / Trim / Exit / Hold. Each decision advances the timeline by one day.
After settlement you get a six-dimension score and an AI coach review. Your result enters the scenario leaderboard.
Related scenarios
- S&P/BMV IPC Downtrend Replay (2011-04-04 to 2011-06-06)2011 · Lv.1
- S&P/BMV IPC Downtrend Replay (2013-12-30 to 2014-03-14)2013 · Lv.1
- S&P/BMV IPC Downtrend Replay (2013-04-11 to 2013-06-20)2013 · Lv.2
- S&P/BMV IPC Downtrend Replay (2013-01-28 to 2013-03-19)2013 · Lv.1
- S&P/BMV IPC Downtrend Replay (2014-11-03 to 2014-12-16)2014 · Lv.1
- S&P/BMV IPC Downtrend Replay (2014-09-08 to 2014-10-16)2014 · Lv.1
Event Replay
What happened — and what it teaches
The S&P/BMV IPC, Mexico's benchmark equity index, entered a correction phase between mid-June and late August 2011. This 52-bar decline presented traders with a sustained downtrend that tested discipline, risk management, and the ability to interpret shifting market signals. Navigating this period meant confronting a 13.9% maximum drawdown while identifying 3 critical turning points among 9 total decision moments.
The index retreated from 35445.65 to 34644.92, a net loss of 2.3%, yet the true challenge lay in the path between those endpoints. A single trading session produced a 5.8% move—the largest bar in the dataset—highlighting the volatility that characterized this correction. Investors who failed to manage position sizes or adjust stops accordingly faced outsized losses relative to the headline decline.
This replay trains participants to distinguish between temporary dislocations and genuine trend changes. Success hinges on disciplined process: sizing positions to survive drawdowns, recognizing inflection points without hindsight bias, and maintaining emotional equilibrium when the largest moves work against you. The lesson is not about calling tops or bottoms, but about executing a sound methodology through adversity.