S&P/BMV IPC Uptrend Replay (2009-06-22 to 2009-09-17)
Replay a 21.4% Mexican IPC uptrend across 126 daily bars as interactive decision training. Step through each session, face 11 decision points, and receive an AI coach review of your choices. Simulated capital, educational use only.
126 daily bars · 11 decision points · 2009-05 to 2009-10 · Stocks
Key facts
This window spans 176 days with a peak-to-trough drawdown of 8.4% and a 34.0% run-up.
- Max drawdown
- −8.4%
- Max run-up
- +34.0%
- Duration
- 176 days
- Largest single-day move
- +4.1%
- Bars
- 126 Daily bars
- Decision points
- 11
Every figure above is computed programmatically from this replay’s own candle series — no editorial input, no LLM. Methodology: Methodology
The market advances day by day. You only see candles up to the current day — as if you were really there.
At key decision points choose Buy / Trim / Exit / Hold. Each decision advances the timeline by one day.
After settlement you get a six-dimension score and an AI coach review. Your result enters the scenario leaderboard.
Related scenarios
- S&P/BMV IPC Uptrend Replay (2009-03-02 to 2009-06-12)2009 · Lv.4
- S&P/BMV IPC Uptrend Replay (2010-08-26 to 2011-01-05)2010 · Lv.3
- S&P/BMV IPC Uptrend Replay (2008-11-20 to 2009-01-02)2008 · Lv.2
- S&P/BMV IPC Uptrend Replay (2007-03-05 to 2007-07-06)2007 · Lv.2
- S&P/BMV IPC Uptrend Replay (2012-05-18 to 2013-01-28)2012 · Lv.3
- S&P/BMV IPC Uptrend Replay (2006-07-14 to 2007-02-21)2006 · Lv.3
Event Replay
What happened — and what it teaches
In mid-2009, the Mexican IPC index found itself in the early stages of a sustained recovery following the global financial crisis. This replay covers 126 daily bars from May 7 to October 30, 2009—a period when emerging market equities were rebounding sharply as investors sought risk assets. The scenario immerses participants in an uptrend environment, challenging them to navigate the tension between capturing gains and managing exposure through 11 decision points, 4 of which are critical junctures where positioning choices carry heightened consequence.
The index climbed from a close of 23589.4 to 28646.03, delivering a cumulative return of 21.4%. However, the path was neither straight nor forgiving—the maximum drawdown reached 8.4%, and volatility manifested in single-day moves as large as 4.1%. These figures underscore that even a strong directional trend presents meaningful intraday turbulence and episodic reversals that test conviction and discipline.
For decision training, this scenario illuminates three core competencies. First, process: participants must develop entry and exit frameworks that are neither reactive nor rigid. Second, risk: the 8.4% drawdown illustrates the importance of position sizing and stop discipline in an environment where pullbacks are inevitable. Third, psychology: maintaining composure through 4.1% single-bar swings separates disciplined traders from impulsive ones. The 4 critical decision points serve as crucible moments where emotional regulation directly impacts outcomes.