Crisis · Jakarta Composite Index (2011)
Indonesia's Jakarta Composite Index navigated a turbulent 2011, suffering a 22.0% peak-to-trough drawdown across 144 daily bars. Step into this replay to make decisions at 25 turning points, including 9 critical moments, and receive an AI coach review of your crisis-era market judgment using simulated capital only.
144 daily bars · 25 decision points · 2011-04 to 2011-11 · Stocks
Key facts
This window spans 215 days with a peak-to-trough drawdown of 22.0% and a 17.1% run-up.
- Max drawdown
- −22.0%
- Max run-up
- +17.1%
- Duration
- 215 days
- Largest single-day move
- −8.9%
- Bars
- 144 Daily bars
- Decision points
- 25
Every figure above is computed programmatically from this replay’s own candle series — no editorial input, no LLM. Methodology: Methodology
The market advances day by day. You only see candles up to the current day — as if you were really there.
At key decision points choose Buy / Trim / Exit / Hold. Each decision advances the timeline by one day.
After settlement you get a six-dimension score and an AI coach review. Your result enters the scenario leaderboard.
Event Replay
What happened — and what it teaches
In 2011, Indonesia's Jakarta Composite Index faced a critical test as global markets grappled with cascading sovereign debt concerns. The period from April 7 to November 8, 2011 placed Southeast Asia's largest stock market at the crossroads of external pressures and domestic resilience. Investors navigating this scenario confronted the question of how emerging markets absorb shocks from transatlantic financial instability.
Across 144 daily bars, the index descended from 3730.58 only to recover to 3805.65, posting a modest 2.0% net gain that masks the underlying turbulence. The maximum drawdown reached 22.0%, while the largest single trading day move hit 8.9%, illustrating the kind of violent intraday swings that can erode confidence or create opportunity depending on one's preparation. Nine critical moments punctuated this period, each demanding a clear-eyed response to shifting sentiment.
This replay cultivates crisis-era judgment by placing trainees in real historical shoes without the benefit of hindsight. The gap between headline index return and actual investor experience reveals why process matters more than outcome. Managing risk through a 22.0% drawdown without abandoning a sound framework tests both discipline and self-awareness. Each of the 25 decision points serves as a laboratory for examining how volatility interacts with decision fatigue, position sizing, and the psychology of loss aversion.