Pandemic · Jakarta Composite Index (2003)
Replay the 2002-11 to 2003-07 Jakarta Composite stretch across 144 daily bars as SARS shock hit Indonesian equities, a 35.4% climb masking a 10.9% drawdown. Walk decision-by-decision through 25 inflection points, submit your calls, then receive an AI coach review of your simulated reasoning.
144 daily bars · 25 decision points · 2002-11 to 2003-07 · Stocks
Key facts
This window spans 223 days with a peak-to-trough drawdown of 10.9% and a 37.0% run-up.
- Max drawdown
- −10.9%
- Max run-up
- +37.0%
- Duration
- 223 days
- Largest single-day move
- +4.5%
- Bars
- 144 Daily bars
- Decision points
- 25
Every figure above is computed programmatically from this replay’s own candle series — no editorial input, no LLM. Methodology: Methodology
The market advances day by day. You only see candles up to the current day — as if you were really there.
At key decision points choose Buy / Trim / Exit / Hold. Each decision advances the timeline by one day.
After settlement you get a six-dimension score and an AI coach review. Your result enters the scenario leaderboard.
Event Replay
What happened — and what it teaches
The Jakarta Composite Index entered late November 2002 at a moment of considerable uncertainty. Across Southeast Asia, the SARS outbreak was beginning to cast a shadow over economic sentiment, and Indonesian equities faced the prospect of disrupted trade, consumer caution, and capital outflows. For market participants in 2002 and early 2003, the central question was whether the region could absorb the health shock without a sustained downturn—or whether fear would overwhelm fundamentals during those critical months ahead.
The period from 2002-11-27 to 2003-07-08 unfolded across 144 daily bars, during which the index climbed from 383.04 to 518.53, a gain of 35.4%. Yet this headline figure concealed turbulence: a maximum drawdown of 10.9% tested conviction, while the largest single-bar move of 4.5% underscored moments when sentiment could swing violently on news flow. Navigating 25 decision points—9 deemed critical—in required participants to read evolving data while managing the psychological weight of uncertainty.
The scenario distills several enduring lessons. Process matters: reacting to each piece of pandemic news without a framework invites whipsawing. Risk management demands accepting that drawdowns are inevitable even in ultimately profitable periods. Psychologically, the index's apparent smoothness across 35.4% masks the internal friction of staying disciplined when 10.9% sits between you and a larger loss. For decision trainees, the Jakarta stretch offers a controlled environment to practice exactly that calibration between patience and prudence.