Collapse · Jakarta Composite Index (2001)
Over 150 trading days, the Jakarta Composite Index crawled from 418.72 to 428.47 while suffering a 25.3% drawdown. Replay each session, navigate 26 decision points, and receive an AI coach review in this simulated training environment.
150 daily bars · 26 decision points · 2000-11 to 2001-06 · Stocks
Key facts
This window spans 225 days with a peak-to-trough drawdown of 25.3% and a 27.9% run-up.
- Max drawdown
- −25.3%
- Max run-up
- +27.9%
- Duration
- 225 days
- Largest single-day move
- +5.0%
- Bars
- 150 Daily bars
- Decision points
- 26
Every figure above is computed programmatically from this replay’s own candle series — no editorial input, no LLM. Methodology: Methodology
The market advances day by day. You only see candles up to the current day — as if you were really there.
At key decision points choose Buy / Trim / Exit / Hold. Each decision advances the timeline by one day.
After settlement you get a six-dimension score and an AI coach review. Your result enters the scenario leaderboard.
Event Replay
What happened — and what it teaches
As the year 2000 drew to a close, Southeast Asian markets grappled with fallout from the global technology sector collapse. The Jakarta Composite Index navigated this treacherous period from 2000-11-15 through 2001-06-28, spanning 150 trading days. Investors faced an environment where the dot-com bubble's unraveling created cascading uncertainty across emerging markets, raising fundamental questions about portfolio construction and risk tolerance during systemic stress.
On the surface, the headline numbers appear almost trivial: the index crawled from 418.72 to 428.47, a gain of just 2.3%. Yet this modest finish concealed violent underlying turbulence, with a maximum drawdown of 25.3% and a largest single-bar move of 5.0%. For anyone watching daily headlines, the final result looked benign. But the journey told an entirely different story—one of extended pain, false recoveries, and whipsaw volatility that tested every participant's conviction.
This 150-day episode offers a rigorous training ground for developing decision-making discipline under pressure. With 26 decision points scattered across the period, including 9 flagged as critical, participants must practice maintaining process when outcomes seem disconnected from effort. The scenario forces confrontation with drawdown psychology: holding conviction when positions move against you 25.3% from peak, despite an eventual flat-to-positive result. It demonstrates that surviving volatility and managing risk are separable skills—and both are essential.