CAD/JPY Historical Replay: 2013-11 to 2014-05
Replay 130 daily bars of CAD/JPY from November 2013, navigating an 8.1% drawdown across 23 decision points. Step through each session, commit to calls, then receive an AI coach review of your reasoning in this educational simulation.
130 daily bars · 23 decision points · 2013-11 to 2014-05 · Forex
Key facts
This window spans 180 days with a peak-to-trough drawdown of 8.1% and a 3.7% run-up.
- Max drawdown
- −8.1%
- Max run-up
- +3.7%
- Duration
- 180 days
- Largest single-day move
- −1.4%
- Bars
- 130 Daily bars
- Decision points
- 23
Every figure above is computed programmatically from this replay’s own candle series — no editorial input, no LLM. Methodology: Methodology
The market advances day by day. You only see candles up to the current day — as if you were really there.
At key decision points choose Buy / Trim / Exit / Hold. Each decision advances the timeline by one day.
After settlement you get a six-dimension score and an AI coach review. Your result enters the scenario leaderboard.
Event Replay
What happened — and what it teaches
CAD/JPY entered November 2013 at a delicate juncture. The G10 pair faced cross-currents from diverging monetary policies, commodity price shifts, and broader emerging-market stress that had been building through the autumn. This 130-bar replay spans 2013-11-15 to 2014-05-14, placing participants in the seat of a macro FX trader navigating 23 decision points—including 8 deemed critical—against a backdrop of genuine uncertainty about where the next catalyst would emerge.
The pair closed the period at 93.512, translating to a modest -2.3% decline from the 95.72 opening level. Yet this headline figure conceals the real story: an 8.1% max drawdown lurking beneath the surface, with individual bars swinging as much as 1.4%. The volatility profile demanded constant reassessment of exposure and conviction levels.
This replay is a pressure test for FX process and psychology. Participants must size positions to survive an 8.1% drawdown without capitulating or over-reducing, decide when the single-bar 1.4% moves signal regime change versus noise, and articulate clear theses before each of the 23 decision gates. The gap between the mild -2.3% net outcome and the turbulent intraperiod journey makes this scenario especially effective for training emotional discipline under uncertainty.