Skip to main content

Regulation · FTSE 100 Index (2013)

StocksFTSE 100GBPolicy2013-04 to 2013-11Difficulty 2/5FreeView charts

Across 150 daily bars from April to November 2013, the FTSE 100 navigated an 11.9% drawdown amid UK bank ring-fencing reform expectations. Replay each trading day, face 26 decision points, and receive an AI coach review in this simulated, educational market-training scenario.

150K lines
26Decision points
2Difficulty
DailyGranularity

150 daily bars · 26 decision points · 2013-04 to 2013-11 · Stocks

Key facts

This window spans 212 days with a peak-to-trough drawdown of 11.9% and a 12.4% run-up.

Max drawdown
−11.9%
Max run-up
+12.4%
Duration
212 days
Largest single-day move
+3.1%
Bars
150 Daily bars
Decision points
26

Every figure above is computed programmatically from this replay’s own candle series — no editorial input, no LLM. Methodology: Methodology

How to play
  1. The market advances day by day. You only see candles up to the current day — as if you were really there.

  2. At key decision points choose Buy / Trim / Exit / Hold. Each decision advances the timeline by one day.

  3. After settlement you get a six-dimension score and an AI coach review. Your result enters the scenario leaderboard.

Event Replay

What happened — and what it teaches

In spring 2013, the FTSE 100 entered a period defined by expectations surrounding UK bank ring-fencing reforms. From April to November, regulatory uncertainty cast a shadow over financial sector sentiment, creating an environment where policy anticipation drove market behavior. Investors faced the challenge of positioning portfolios amid shifting expectations about how new rules would reshape the banking landscape.

The index rose from 6280.6 to 6681.1, delivering a 6.4% gain over the 150 daily bars. Yet this surface-level optimism obscured considerable turbulence: an 11.9% maximum drawdown tested portfolio resilience, while the largest single-bar move of 3.1% underscored moments of acute volatility. Across the period, traders confronted 26 decision points, with 9 deemed critical, demanding repeated reassessment of positions and risk exposure.

This replay hones the ability to maintain discipline through policy-driven uncertainty. The lesson centers on process over prediction: controlling emotional responses, managing downside risk during extended drawdowns, and systematically reviewing decisions at each inflection point. Navigating regulatory change demands psychological steadiness and a commitment to refining one's approach through every twist of policy anticipation.