Regulation · FTSE 100 Index (2011)
Replay 144 turbulent daily bars across the 2011 FTSE 100, where the index fell 11.6% from 6068.2 to 5362.9 amid regulatory upheaval. Step through each session, tackle 25 decision points with 9 critical, and receive an AI coach review in this simulated market training.
144 daily bars · 25 decision points · 2011-04 to 2011-11 · Stocks
Key facts
This window spans 205 days with a peak-to-trough drawdown of 18.7% and a 15.6% run-up.
- Max drawdown
- −18.7%
- Max run-up
- +15.6%
- Duration
- 205 days
- Largest single-day move
- −4.7%
- Bars
- 144 Daily bars
- Decision points
- 25
Every figure above is computed programmatically from this replay’s own candle series — no editorial input, no LLM. Methodology: Methodology
The market advances day by day. You only see candles up to the current day — as if you were really there.
At key decision points choose Buy / Trim / Exit / Hold. Each decision advances the timeline by one day.
After settlement you get a six-dimension score and an AI coach review. Your result enters the scenario leaderboard.
Event Replay
What happened — and what it teaches
In the spring of 2011, European equity markets faced an unprecedented regulatory experiment when the EU imposed a temporary ban on short-selling financial stocks. The FTSE 100 became a testing ground for understanding how interventions reshape market behavior when traditional hedging tools are suddenly restricted. For traders entering this replay, the challenge was navigating 144 daily bars of authentic historical volatility without relying on assumptions about normal market mechanics.
From April 27 to November 18, 2011, the index fell 11.6%, declining from 6068.2 to 5362.9. Yet the headline percentage obscures a rougher journey: the maximum drawdown reached 18.7%, and the largest single session moved 4.7%. These numbers reveal a market that punished complacency, where directional conviction alone offered insufficient protection against regime shifts driven by policy uncertainty.
This replay presents 25 decision points, 9 of them critical, testing your ability to adapt when the regulatory framework itself changes mid-journey. The lesson is not about predicting policy outcomes but about maintaining disciplined process, sizing risk appropriately for tail events, and managing the psychological pressure of trading through unfamiliar market structures. Success here is measured by adaptive decision-making, not by hindsight accuracy.