War · FTSE 100 Index (2011)
Replay 144 daily bars from late 2010 as the FTSE 100 fell 1.6% to 5853.8 amid North African military intervention oil shocks. Step through 25 decision points, including 9 critical calls, and review each trade with the AI coach in a simulated environment.
144 daily bars · 25 decision points · 2010-12 to 2011-07 · Stocks
Key facts
This window spans 211 days with a peak-to-trough drawdown of 8.1% and a 8.7% run-up.
- Max drawdown
- −8.1%
- Max run-up
- +8.7%
- Duration
- 211 days
- Largest single-day move
- +2.1%
- Bars
- 144 Daily bars
- Decision points
- 25
Every figure above is computed programmatically from this replay’s own candle series — no editorial input, no LLM. Methodology: Methodology
The market advances day by day. You only see candles up to the current day — as if you were really there.
At key decision points choose Buy / Trim / Exit / Hold. Each decision advances the timeline by one day.
After settlement you get a six-dimension score and an AI coach review. Your result enters the scenario leaderboard.
Event Replay
What happened — and what it teaches
The FTSE 100 entered a volatile period as geopolitical tensions escalated across North Africa in late 2010. Military intervention in the region threatened global oil supply chains, sending shockwaves through European markets already grappling with lingering sovereign debt concerns. Participants in this replay faced the challenge of navigating a market environment where energy disruptions could rapidly reshape sentiment and valuations across multiple sectors.
Over 144 daily bars from 2010-12-21 to 2011-07-20, the FTSE 100 closed at 5853.8, representing a decline of -1.6% from the opening level of 5951.8. The index experienced a maximum drawdown of 8.1% while facing a largest single-bar move of 2.1%. These conditions generated 25 decision points throughout the period, with 9 classified as critical moments requiring careful assessment and risk calibration.
This scenario tests a trader's ability to manage positions through geopolitical uncertainty while maintaining disciplined risk controls. The episode highlights how external shocks can create sustained volatility without clear directional trends, challenging participants to distinguish between temporary dislocations and fundamental regime changes. Navigating such environments requires balancing conviction with flexibility, managing drawdown exposure, and adhering to process when headlines drive emotional market reactions.