FTSE 250 Uptrend Replay (2008-03-17 to 2008-04-02)
Replay 30 days of 2008 FTSE 250 history with a 7.5% drawdown and seven decision points, three marked critical. Step through each session, weigh your calls, and receive an AI coach review on your decision-making, all purely simulated.
30 daily bars · 7 decision points · 2008-03 to 2008-04 · Stocks
Key facts
This window spans 43 days with a peak-to-trough drawdown of 7.5% and a 10.6% run-up.
- Max drawdown
- −7.5%
- Max run-up
- +10.6%
- Duration
- 43 days
- Largest single-day move
- +3.7%
- Bars
- 30 Daily bars
- Decision points
- 7
Every figure above is computed programmatically from this replay’s own candle series — no editorial input, no LLM. Methodology: Methodology
The market advances day by day. You only see candles up to the current day — as if you were really there.
At key decision points choose Buy / Trim / Exit / Hold. Each decision advances the timeline by one day.
After settlement you get a six-dimension score and an AI coach review. Your result enters the scenario leaderboard.
Event Replay
What happened — and what it teaches
In early 2008, the FTSE 250 stood at the crossroads of one of the most turbulent decades in modern financial history. This replay transports you to a 30-day window spanning from March 3 to April 15, 2008, when the index moved from 10013.9 to 9904.2, delivering a modest net decline of -1.1%. The scenario is tagged as a "rally" event, suggesting periods of upward momentum embedded within this broader pullback—a combination that tested the resolve of any participant navigating the 2000s era.
The numbers tell a story of compressed volatility. A maximum drawdown of 7.5% tested portfolio durability, while the largest single-bar move of 3.7% reminded traders how quickly sentiment could shift within a single session. Seven decision points are scattered across the 30 daily bars, three of which are marked as critical junctions where directional conviction mattered most. These aren't hypotheticals—they are authentic inflection points drawn from the historical record, waiting for your choices.
This replay is less about predicting direction and more about sharpening the process of decision-making under uncertainty. Managing a 7.5% drawdown requires disciplined risk calibration; reacting to 3.7% single-day swings demands emotional equilibrium. The three critical decision points serve as pressure tests for your methodology—are you following a consistent framework, or allowing short-term noise to derail your thesis? Use this as a laboratory for the psychological discipline that separates systematic traders from reactive gamblers.
Featured in the archive