CSI 300 Downtrend Replay (2015-12-22 to 2016-01-28)
Replay the CSI 300 crash from December 2015 through February 2016, where the index fell 18.7% across 54 daily bars. Walk through each session, face critical decision points, and review your choices with the AI coach in a simulated training environment.
54 daily bars · 10 decision points · 2015-12 to 2016-02 · Stocks
Key facts
This window spans 83 days with a peak-to-trough drawdown of 27.5% and a 8.8% run-up.
- Max drawdown
- −27.5%
- Max run-up
- +8.8%
- Duration
- 83 days
- Largest single-day move
- −6.3%
- Bars
- 54 Daily bars
- Decision points
- 10
Every figure above is computed programmatically from this replay’s own candle series — no editorial input, no LLM. Methodology: Methodology
The market advances day by day. You only see candles up to the current day — as if you were really there.
At key decision points choose Buy / Trim / Exit / Hold. Each decision advances the timeline by one day.
After settlement you get a six-dimension score and an AI coach review. Your result enters the scenario leaderboard.
Related scenarios
- CSI 300 Downtrend Replay (2015-08-10 to 2015-08-25)2015 · Lv.5
- CSI 300 Downtrend Replay (2021-12-09 to 2022-03-15)2021 · Lv.3
- Russell 2000 Downtrend Replay (2015-12-01 to 2016-02-11)2015 · Lv.2
- CSI 300 Downtrend Replay (2022-07-04 to 2022-10-31)2022 · Lv.1
- Energy Sel SPDR Downtrend Replay (2016-12-13 to 2017-08-17)2016 · Lv.2
- Energy Sel SPDR Downtrend Replay (2014-06-23 to 2014-10-14)2014 · Lv.2
Event Replay
What happened — and what it teaches
In late 2015, the CSI 300 faced mounting pressure as China's stock market reeled from the summer crash. This replay spans 54 trading days from December 2, 2015 to February 23, 2016, placing participants in the shoes of investors navigating an accelerating downtrend with 10 critical decision points. The scenario captures a pivotal moment when authorities struggled to stabilize markets and investor confidence hung by a thread.
The index closed the period at 3.08, down 18.7% from its December opening of 3.79. The journey was brutal: a maximum drawdown of 27.5% tested even the most disciplined traders, while individual sessions saw moves as large as 6.3%. Across the 54 daily bars, the market offered no easy refuge, with selling pressure persistent and rallies short-lived.
For decision training, this replay forces participants to confront the interplay of process, risk management, and psychology. Managing positions through a 27.5% peak-to-trough decline requires discipline; reacting to 6.3% single-day swings tests emotional control. The scenario reveals how pre-defined rules and position sizing determine survival, not market predictions. Participants learn that navigating crashes demands adherence to process over impulse.