CSI 300 Uptrend Replay (2015-09-29 to 2015-11-09)
Replay a 50-day slice of the 2015 CSI 300 uptrend, with a 13.3% close-to-close run, 6.5% max drawdown, and 9 decision points (3 critical). Step through each trading day, weigh your calls, then receive an AI coach review of the simulated decisions.
50 daily bars · 9 decision points · 2015-09 to 2015-11 · Stocks
Key facts
This window spans 76 days with a peak-to-trough drawdown of 6.5% and a 23.0% run-up.
- Max drawdown
- −6.5%
- Max run-up
- +23.0%
- Duration
- 76 days
- Largest single-day move
- +6.0%
- Bars
- 50 Daily bars
- Decision points
- 9
Every figure above is computed programmatically from this replay’s own candle series — no editorial input, no LLM. Methodology: Methodology
The market advances day by day. You only see candles up to the current day — as if you were really there.
At key decision points choose Buy / Trim / Exit / Hold. Each decision advances the timeline by one day.
After settlement you get a six-dimension score and an AI coach review. Your result enters the scenario leaderboard.
Related scenarios
- CSI 300 Uptrend Replay (2015-02-06 to 2015-04-27)2014 · Lv.4
- CSI 300 Uptrend Replay (2014-05-19 to 2014-12-08)2014 · Lv.3
- CSI 300 Uptrend Replay (2017-05-10 to 2017-11-21)2017 · Lv.3
- CSI 300 Uptrend Replay (2019-01-02 to 2019-04-19)2018 · Lv.3
- CSI 300 Uptrend Replay (2012-12-03 to 2013-02-05)2012 · Lv.2
- CSI 300 Uptrend Replay (2020-09-09 to 2021-01-12)2020 · Lv.2
Event Replay
What happened — and what it teaches
The CSI 300 in the autumn of 2015 represented a pivotal test of market resilience following the summer's dramatic unwinding. During the 2010s era, this recovery phase asked whether bearish momentum had exhausted itself or whether further downside loomed. For traders and investors navigating the aftermath, the stakes were high: distinguishing sustainable recovery from a dead-cat bounce required disciplined analysis and nerve.
Over 50 trading days from September 10 to November 25, 2015, the index climbed from 3.38 to 3.83, delivering a 13.3% close-to-close return. The trajectory, however, was anything but linear—a 6.5% maximum drawdown challenged conviction at multiple points, while the largest single-bar move of 6.0% demanded rapid reassessment of risk exposure. Nine decision points punctuated the period, three of them critical junctures where directional calls carried heightened consequence.
This replay session sharpens decision-making under ambiguity. Participants must calibrate position sizing against the 6.5% drawdown ceiling, recognize when momentum signals warrant adding exposure versus when volatility signals retreat. The psychological dimension proves equally vital: holding through pullbacks, resisting overtrading after volatile bars, and maintaining process discipline when the market oscillates between optimism and caution. The 2015 CSI 300 experience remains a rich laboratory for studying how conviction, risk management, and emotional regulation interact in trending but turbulent markets.