San Francisco Historical Replay: 2005-03 to 2007-08
Replay San Francisco property history across 30 monthly bars from March 2005 through August 2007, a period marked by a 4.7% drawdown and 1.8% swings. You step through each authentic trading day, face 6 decision points with 2 critical ones, and receive an AI coach review—simulated capital, educational use only.
30 monthly bars · 6 decision points · 2005-03 to 2007-08 · Property
Key facts
Peak-to-trough drawdown of 4.7% with a 10.1% run-up.
- Max drawdown
- −4.7%
- Max run-up
- +10.1%
- Largest single-month move
- +1.8%
- Bars
- 30 Monthly bars
- Decision points
- 6
Every figure above is computed programmatically from this replay’s own candle series — no editorial input, no LLM. Methodology: Methodology
The market advances day by day. You only see candles up to the current day — as if you were really there.
At key decision points choose Buy / Trim / Exit / Hold. Each decision advances the timeline by one day.
After settlement you get a six-dimension score and an AI coach review. Your result enters the scenario leaderboard.
Related scenarios
- US 10-City Composite Historical Replay: 2005-03 to 2007-082005 · Lv.2
- US 20-City Composite Historical Replay: 2005-03 to 2007-082005 · Lv.2
- New York Historical Replay: 2005-03 to 2007-082005 · Lv.2
- San Diego Historical Replay: 2005-03 to 2007-082005 · Lv.1
- Seattle Historical Replay: 2005-03 to 2007-082005 · Lv.3
- Boston Historical Replay: 2005-03 to 2007-082005 · Lv.1
Event Replay
What happened — and what it teaches
The replay transports you to San Francisco's property market during a pivotal phase of the 2000s housing cycle. The thirty-month window from March 2005 through August 2007 captures the market at a critical juncture—still riding the extended uptrend that defined the early decade, yet beginning to encounter the mounting pressures that would eventually erupt into the subprime crisis. You step through each monthly bar facing six decision points, including two that the scenario marks as critical nodes where your choices carry heightened consequence. The question at every turn is how to read a market that appears stable on the surface but conceals building fragility beneath.
Across the full data span the market delivered a modest 5.0% return, closing at 208.15 from an opening of 198.3. Yet this headline gain obscures the turbulence within: a maximum drawdown of 4.7% tested portfolio endurance at some point during the period, while the largest single-bar move of 1.8% reveals how even monthly granularity can surprise. The subtlety of this environment lies in its restraint—nothing dramatic, no crash indicators flashing, just a grinding sideways-to-down pressure that eroded confidence by degrees. Navigating six decision points under these conditions demanded disciplined risk calibration.
This replay teaches that headline returns tell only part of the story. The 4.7% drawdown and 1.8% single-bar volatility underscore how drawdown management, timing, and emotional composure under pressure are as consequential as directional conviction. By confronting authentic historical conditions without hindsight, you train yourself to assess risk-reward in real time, calibrate position sizing against hidden volatility, and practice holding discipline when positions turn against you—skills that transfer across any market environment and time horizon.
Featured in the archive