Seattle Historical Replay: 1995-04 to 1997-09
Replay 30 monthly bars of Seattle's property market from April 1995, where prices climbed just 15.2% with only a 1.0% drawdown. Step into the timeline, tackle 6 decision points, and receive an AI coach review of your simulated, educational choices.
30 monthly bars · 6 decision points · 1995-04 to 1997-09 · Property
Key facts
Peak-to-trough drawdown of 1.0% with a 15.2% run-up.
- Max drawdown
- −1.0%
- Max run-up
- +15.2%
- Largest single-month move
- +1.9%
- Bars
- 30 Monthly bars
- Decision points
- 6
Every figure above is computed programmatically from this replay’s own candle series — no editorial input, no LLM. Methodology: Methodology
The market advances day by day. You only see candles up to the current day — as if you were really there.
At key decision points choose Buy / Trim / Exit / Hold. Each decision advances the timeline by one day.
After settlement you get a six-dimension score and an AI coach review. Your result enters the scenario leaderboard.
Event Replay
What happened — and what it teaches
April 1995 found Seattle's property market at a pivotal moment. The tech boom was still years away from its peak, yet the city was quietly laying groundwork for the economic transformation of the coming decade. Over the next 30 months, investors navigating this market would face six decision points, each requiring careful assessment of risk and opportunity. The period offered a test of patience and discipline, as the market rewarded steady holding rather than aggressive trading.
Prices climbed from 71.28 to 82.1, a gain of 15.2% across the 30-month span. Remarkably, the maximum drawdown never exceeded 1.0%, and the largest single monthly move was just 1.9%. This was not a period of dramatic swings or quick fortunes. Instead, it was a slow, steady climb that rewarded those who stayed the course and avoided reacting to minor fluctuations.
This scenario teaches that not all market periods demand bold action. In low-volatility environments, the challenge lies in resisting the urge to overtrade and maintaining conviction in a measured approach. Decision trainees learn to identify when patience is the strategic edge, how to manage risk within tight parameters, and the psychological discipline required to let a modest but consistent trend work in their favor. Six decision points across this period become training ground for calibrating judgment under calm, ambiguous conditions.
Featured in the archive