San Francisco Historical Replay: 1995-03 to 1997-08
Replay 30 monthly bars from San Francisco's 1995–1997 property boom, where prices climbed 11.4% with just a 2.7% drawdown. Step through six authentic decision points, two of them critical, and receive an AI coach review of your choices in this simulated training environment.
30 monthly bars · 6 decision points · 1995-03 to 1997-08 · Property
Key facts
Peak-to-trough drawdown of 2.7% with a 12.9% run-up.
- Max drawdown
- −2.7%
- Max run-up
- +12.9%
- Largest single-month move
- +1.9%
- Bars
- 30 Monthly bars
- Decision points
- 6
Every figure above is computed programmatically from this replay’s own candle series — no editorial input, no LLM. Methodology: Methodology
The market advances day by day. You only see candles up to the current day — as if you were really there.
At key decision points choose Buy / Trim / Exit / Hold. Each decision advances the timeline by one day.
After settlement you get a six-dimension score and an AI coach review. Your result enters the scenario leaderboard.
Event Replay
What happened — and what it teaches
San Francisco's property market during the 1990s provided a distinctive training ground for decision-makers navigating a sustained urban boom. From March 1995 to August 1997, the market delivered 30 monthly bars of authentic price data across six decision points, two of which proved critical to outcomes. Participants faced the challenge of reading momentum in a market that offered few obvious warning signals, making every entry and exit choice consequential for portfolio positioning in a city reshaping itself around an emerging technology economy.
The numbers tell a story of steady appreciation under controlled conditions. Prices climbed from 66.79 to 74.43, representing an 11.4% gain over the full period. What stands out is the discipline of the advance: maximum drawdown totaled just 2.7%, and the largest single monthly move measured only 1.9%. This was not a dramatic rally but rather a measured climb that rewarded patience while demanding careful attention to position sizing and risk management.
This replay teaches the psychology of holding conviction in quiet markets. The limited volatility means participants cannot rely on dramatic pullbacks to add positions or take profits. Instead, the discipline becomes recognizing when a low-drama trend deserves continued exposure and when the absence of movement itself signals changing conditions. Process matters more than prediction here: how you structure decisions across six points determines whether you capture the full 11.4% or exit prematurely, and the tight 2.7% drawdown ceiling reminds every participant that protection of capital and participation in trends must be balanced simultaneously.