New York Historical Replay: 1991-03 to 1993-08
Replay thirty monthly bars of a New York city property market from 1991-03 to 1993-08, tracking a 5.7% close-to-close climb within a 1.1% max drawdown. Step into 6 decision points, two of them critical, and receive AI coach feedback on each choice in this simulated historical exercise.
30 monthly bars · 6 decision points · 1991-03 to 1993-08 · Property
Key facts
Peak-to-trough drawdown of 1.1% with a 6.5% run-up.
- Max drawdown
- −1.1%
- Max run-up
- +6.5%
- Largest single-month move
- +1.2%
- Bars
- 30 Monthly bars
- Decision points
- 6
Every figure above is computed programmatically from this replay’s own candle series — no editorial input, no LLM. Methodology: Methodology
The market advances day by day. You only see candles up to the current day — as if you were really there.
At key decision points choose Buy / Trim / Exit / Hold. Each decision advances the timeline by one day.
After settlement you get a six-dimension score and an AI coach review. Your result enters the scenario leaderboard.
Event Replay
What happened — and what it teaches
This replay immerses you in the New York city property market during the early 1990s, spanning from 1991-03 to 1993-08. The market was navigating post-recession recovery conditions. Participants face six decision points across thirty monthly bars, with two marked as critical moments where strategic choices carry heightened consequence. The environment tests one's ability to read market signals during an uncertain economic transition.
The market closed at 72.87 in March 1991 and climbed to 76.99 by August 1993, representing a 5.7% appreciation. The trajectory featured remarkably contained volatility—a maximum drawdown of just 1.1% and the largest single monthly move reaching only 1.2%—demonstrating a stable but gradually rising market character.
This scenario teaches decision discipline in a market offering slim margins and limited volatility. The compressed drawdown suggests that during early-cycle recovery, patience and adherence to process may matter more than aggressive positioning. The distinction between the six decision points and the two critical ones sharpens judgment about when conviction truly matters. Psychological resilience under low-reward conditions is the core skill this replay develops.