Inflation · Bovespa Index (2013)
The Bovespa Index slid 22.4% from 61128 to 47422 between January and August 2013 as inflation pressures intensified. Replay those 144 authentic market days, decide at 25 decision points, and receive an AI coach review in this educational, simulated-capital training.
144 daily bars · 25 decision points · 2013-01 to 2013-08 · Stocks
Key facts
This window spans 210 days with a peak-to-trough drawdown of 27.6% and a 9.7% run-up.
- Max drawdown
- −27.6%
- Max run-up
- +9.7%
- Duration
- 210 days
- Largest single-day move
- −4.2%
- Bars
- 144 Daily bars
- Decision points
- 25
Every figure above is computed programmatically from this replay’s own candle series — no editorial input, no LLM. Methodology: Methodology
The market advances day by day. You only see candles up to the current day — as if you were really there.
At key decision points choose Buy / Trim / Exit / Hold. Each decision advances the timeline by one day.
After settlement you get a six-dimension score and an AI coach review. Your result enters the scenario leaderboard.
Event Replay
What happened — and what it teaches
The Bovespa Index entered 2013 as one of the world's most watched emerging markets, yet mounting inflation pressures began to reshape investor sentiment across the Brazilian equity landscape. Between January and August of that year, traders faced a sustained deterioration in the macro environment, with price stability becoming increasingly elusive. The scenario places participants directly into 144 authentic daily bars, asking them to navigate a market where the fundamental backdrop was shifting against risk appetite.
What unfolded was a defining drawdown for Brazilian equities: the index fell from 61128 to 47422, a decline of -22.4% over the replay period. The journey was far from smooth, with a maximum drawdown of 27.6% testing even the most disciplined position managers, while a largest single-bar move of 4.2% served as a reminder of the volatility embedded in this market during periods of stress.
This replay sharpens decision-making under sustained pressure. Participants confront 25 decision points, 9 of which are critical, forcing them to balance conviction against deteriorating trends. The scenario teaches that managing risk during prolonged declines requires both technical discipline and emotional resilience—knowing when to reduce exposure and when to maintain positions separates disciplined traders from reactive ones. Completing this historical episode reveals how anchoring to process, rather than reacting to headlines, shapes long-term performance in volatile markets.
Featured in the archive