BEL 20 Downtrend Replay (2007-12-10 to 2008-01-23)
Replay the BEL 20 correction from 2007-11-16 to 2008-02-12, watching the index slide 9.0% across 60 daily bars with a 17.2% peak drawdown. You will navigate 11 decision points in this simulated environment, facing volatility as it unfolded and receiving an AI coach review after each call.
60 daily bars · 11 decision points · 2007-11 to 2008-02 · Stocks
Key facts
This window spans 88 days with a peak-to-trough drawdown of 17.2% and a 10.1% run-up.
- Max drawdown
- −17.2%
- Max run-up
- +10.1%
- Duration
- 88 days
- Largest single-day move
- +6.5%
- Bars
- 60 Daily bars
- Decision points
- 11
Every figure above is computed programmatically from this replay’s own candle series — no editorial input, no LLM. Methodology: Methodology
The market advances day by day. You only see candles up to the current day — as if you were really there.
At key decision points choose Buy / Trim / Exit / Hold. Each decision advances the timeline by one day.
After settlement you get a six-dimension score and an AI coach review. Your result enters the scenario leaderboard.
Event Replay
What happened — and what it teaches
The BEL 20, Belgium's benchmark equity index, entered a defining correction phase spanning from late 2007 into early 2008. This 60-bar daily replay captures a pivotal moment in 2000s market history when European equities faced mounting uncertainty following the subprime crisis escalation. Participants navigate this correction as it unfolded, facing real volatility without the benefit of hindsight knowledge, managing positions through a period when even quality names came under pressure.
The index retreated from 4060.71 to 3694.05, representing a 9.0% decline over the period. The journey proved far rougher than the net result suggests, with a peak drawdown of 17.2% testing even disciplined participants. A single session saw a 6.5% swing, underscoring the emotional demands of trading through genuine turbulence. This discrepancy between headline loss and actual experience captures why corrections feel worse than they measure.
This scenario distills essential lessons in risk management and emotional discipline. Facing 11 decision points including 4 critical moments, participants must execute a clear process while managing fear and greed. The gap between the 9.0% net loss and 17.2% drawdown illustrates why position sizing and stop-loss discipline matter more than directional conviction. By replaying authentic conditions, traders develop the psychological resilience required when real capital is at stake, learning to separate the noise of daily moves from the signal of structural trends.