ATX Uptrend Replay (2013-04-18 to 2013-05-21)
Replay a 42-bar Austrian ATX stretch from April 3 to June 5, 2013, capturing a 5.8% drawdown within a 1.4% net move. Step through eight decision points, including three flagged critical, and receive an AI coach review of your simulated trades.
42 daily bars · 8 decision points · 2013-04 to 2013-06 · Stocks
Key facts
This window spans 63 days with a peak-to-trough drawdown of 5.8% and a 8.4% run-up.
- Max drawdown
- −5.8%
- Max run-up
- +8.4%
- Duration
- 63 days
- Largest single-day move
- +2.5%
- Bars
- 42 Daily bars
- Decision points
- 8
Every figure above is computed programmatically from this replay’s own candle series — no editorial input, no LLM. Methodology: Methodology
The market advances day by day. You only see candles up to the current day — as if you were really there.
At key decision points choose Buy / Trim / Exit / Hold. Each decision advances the timeline by one day.
After settlement you get a six-dimension score and an AI coach review. Your result enters the scenario leaderboard.
Related scenarios
- ATX Uptrend Replay (2012-09-28 to 2013-01-09)2012 · Lv.3
- ATX Uptrend Replay (2013-12-17 to 2014-01-15)2013 · Lv.1
- ATX Uptrend Replay (2012-07-24 to 2012-08-17)2012 · Lv.1
- ATX Uptrend Replay (2011-03-16 to 2011-03-30)2011 · Lv.1
- ATX Uptrend Replay (2010-07-05 to 2010-08-04)2010 · Lv.1
- ATX Uptrend Replay (2010-06-08 to 2010-06-21)2010 · Lv.3
Event Replay
What happened — and what it teaches
In the spring of 2013, the Austrian ATX equity index entered a challenging traversal spanning 42 trading days from April 3 to June 5. This period presented traders with a deceptively modest net outcome—essentially flat-to-slightly-positive—but one fraught with internal turbulence. Eight decision points punctuated the journey, three of which the replay flags as critical junctures where directional conviction and risk management faced their sternest tests. For participants, the scenario asked a fundamental question: how do you preserve capital when the headline number misleads about underlying difficulty?
The raw statistics reveal the tension: the index closed the period at 2408.14, up merely 1.4% from its 2373.75 opening—barely distinguishable from unchanged. Yet within that narrow band, a maximum drawdown of 5.8% materialized, along with a largest single-day swing of 2.5%. These figures expose a market that churned beneath a placid surface, rewarding patience and discipline while punishing impulsive entry and inadequate position sizing.
This replay distills essential lessons for developing traders. Process matters more than outcome: navigating an environment where the terminal result looks benign requires sustained attention to risk controls that protect against drawdown. The three critical decision points test whether participants can adjust exposure when volatility exceeds expectations. Psychologically, the scenario trains traders to resist the narrative that a small net move equals low difficulty—true skill lies in recognizing hidden complexity and responding with appropriate humility and flexibility.
Featured in the archive