Skip to main content

ATX Downtrend Replay (2013-03-08 to 2013-04-05)

StocksATXATCorrection2013-02 to 2013-04Difficulty 1/5FreeView charts

Replay a Vienna-listed ATX correction from February to April 2013, when the index fell 4.0% across 38 daily bars. Step through each session, tackle 7 decision points, and receive an AI coach review in a simulated, educational market-replay environment.

38K lines
7Decision points
1Difficulty
DailyGranularity

38 daily bars · 7 decision points · 2013-02 to 2013-04 · Stocks

Key facts

This window spans 55 days with a peak-to-trough drawdown of 8.7% and a 6.1% run-up.

Max drawdown
−8.7%
Max run-up
+6.1%
Duration
55 days
Largest single-day move
+2.5%
Bars
38 Daily bars
Decision points
7

Every figure above is computed programmatically from this replay’s own candle series — no editorial input, no LLM. Methodology: Methodology

How to play
  1. The market advances day by day. You only see candles up to the current day — as if you were really there.

  2. At key decision points choose Buy / Trim / Exit / Hold. Each decision advances the timeline by one day.

  3. After settlement you get a six-dimension score and an AI coach review. Your result enters the scenario leaderboard.

Event Replay

What happened — and what it teaches

The Vienna Stock Exchange's ATX index entered a correction phase between late February and mid-April 2013, a period marked by heightened uncertainty in European equity markets. This 38-day replay captures a microcosm of the broader 2010s volatility, where investors navigated shifting sentiment across the continent. Participants face the challenge of managing positions through a documented pullback with authentic historical price action.

The index declined from 2421.64 to 2325.82, representing a 4.0% fall over the replay window. The journey was not smooth—maximum drawdown reached 8.7%, with individual sessions moving as much as 2.5%. Across 7 decision points, including 3 critical junctures, players must determine entries, exits, and risk management in real time without knowing the outcome in advance.

This scenario sharpens decision-making under uncertainty, where the difference between a disciplined response and panic often defines outcomes. The challenge lies in processing downside moves without abandoning sound methodology, a recurring theme across market cycles. For trainees, the value is in building confidence to act systematically when the noise of a drawdown tests resolve.