ADX Uptrend Replay (2014-02-03 to 2014-04-09)
Replay 94 daily bars of the 2014 ADX uptrend, where the index climbed only 1.5% from 50.7 to 51.47 despite a 7.2% drawdown along the way. Step through each trading day, make your own calls at 11 decision points, and receive an AI coach review of your historical decision-making, all in a simulated educational environment.
94 daily bars · 11 decision points · 2013-12 to 2014-05 · Stocks
Key facts
This window spans 137 days with a peak-to-trough drawdown of 7.2% and a 14.9% run-up.
- Max drawdown
- −7.2%
- Max run-up
- +14.9%
- Duration
- 137 days
- Largest single-day move
- −4.2%
- Bars
- 94 Daily bars
- Decision points
- 11
Every figure above is computed programmatically from this replay’s own candle series — no editorial input, no LLM. Methodology: Methodology
The market advances day by day. You only see candles up to the current day — as if you were really there.
At key decision points choose Buy / Trim / Exit / Hold. Each decision advances the timeline by one day.
After settlement you get a six-dimension score and an AI coach review. Your result enters the scenario leaderboard.
Related scenarios
- ADX Uptrend Replay (2013-10-09 to 2013-11-15)2013 · Lv.1
- ADX Uptrend Replay (2013-06-24 to 2013-08-01)2013 · Lv.1
- ADX Uptrend Replay (2013-04-18 to 2013-05-17)2013 · Lv.1
- ADX Uptrend Replay (2012-07-12 to 2012-09-14)2012 · Lv.1
- ADX Uptrend Replay (2015-03-26 to 2015-06-01)2015 · Lv.3
- ADX Uptrend Replay (2011-04-18 to 2011-05-18)2011 · Lv.2
Event Replay
What happened — and what it teaches
The Abu Dhabi Exchange (ADX) entered 2014 as many emerging markets did—cautiously optimistic but fragile. The scenario covers 94 daily bars from late December 2013 to mid-May 2014, a period when regional geopolitics, global liquidity concerns, and oil price volatility created a tense backdrop for Gulf equities. At stake was a fundamental question: how to navigate a market that offered marginal returns with significant underlying risk.
The numbers reveal a market that rewarded patience but tested conviction. The index closed at 50.7 and ended at 51.47—a gain of just 1.5% over the full span. Yet this modest upside was accompanied by a 7.2% drawdown and a 4.2% single-bar swing, meaning participants faced meaningful volatility for minimal reward. At 11 decision points (4 critical), traders had to repeatedly reassess positions in a low-visibility environment.
For decision training, this replay illustrates the gap between directional bias and outcome. A correct outlook on Gulf markets meant little if position sizing ignored the 4.2% intrabar shocks or the 7.2% peak-to-trough decline. The scenario demands disciplined risk management, clear entry/exit criteria, and psychological resilience under noise. Players learn that in choppy trends, process trumps prediction.