ADX Downtrend Replay (2011-02-17 to 2011-03-16)
Replay 38 daily bars of an ADX correction unfolding from February to March 2011, with an 11.3% drawdown testing disciplined decision-making. Step through each session, weigh seven decision points, and receive an AI coach review of your choices in this simulated market-training exercise.
38 daily bars · 7 decision points · 2011-02 to 2011-03 · Stocks
Key facts
This window spans 54 days with a peak-to-trough drawdown of 11.3% and a 8.1% run-up.
- Max drawdown
- −11.3%
- Max run-up
- +8.1%
- Duration
- 54 days
- Largest single-day move
- −3.3%
- Bars
- 38 Daily bars
- Decision points
- 7
Every figure above is computed programmatically from this replay’s own candle series — no editorial input, no LLM. Methodology: Methodology
The market advances day by day. You only see candles up to the current day — as if you were really there.
At key decision points choose Buy / Trim / Exit / Hold. Each decision advances the timeline by one day.
After settlement you get a six-dimension score and an AI coach review. Your result enters the scenario leaderboard.
Related scenarios
- ADX Downtrend Replay (2012-03-26 to 2012-05-18)2012 · Lv.1
- ADX Downtrend Replay (2011-11-04 to 2011-11-25)2011 · Lv.2
- ADX Downtrend Replay (2010-04-14 to 2010-05-07)2010 · Lv.2
- ADX Downtrend Replay (2014-06-10 to 2014-08-07)2014 · Lv.1
- ADX Downtrend Replay (2009-02-06 to 2009-02-23)2009 · Lv.2
- ADX Downtrend Replay (2008-06-05 to 2008-07-09)2008 · Lv.4
Event Replay
What happened — and what it teaches
The Abu Dhabi Securities Exchange entered a correction phase amid the heightened volatility of early 2011, when regional uncertainty was reshaping Gulf markets. This replay condenses 38 daily bars spanning February 3 to March 29, 2011, placing participants inside a compressed, high-stakes environment where seven decision points—three marked as critical—demanded careful navigation. The scenario asks: how would you manage risk when the market's direction is contested?
The index closed at 39.5 from an opening of 39.23, a net gain of just 0.7%—deceptively mild. Behind that narrow outcome lay an 11.3% maximum drawdown and single-bar swings reaching 3.3%, creating multiple moments where positions faced sharp adverse moves. Participants who reacted impulsively to intraday spikes likely amplified losses; those with disciplined frameworks had to decide when to hold, adjust, or exit.
This correction teaches that process matters more than prediction. The 11.3% drawdown underscores how corrections test a trader's tolerance for temporary losses and adherence to pre-defined risk limits. Seven decision points reward systematic evaluation over guesswork, while the 3.3% largest move highlights the psychological challenge of holding through volatility spikes. Surviving a correction requires both analytical rigor and emotional control—qualities this historical scenario is designed to develop.