Skip to main content

ADX Downtrend Replay (2011-02-17 to 2011-03-16)

StocksFTSE ADX IndexAECorrection2011-02 to 2011-03Difficulty 1/5FreeView charts

Replay 38 daily bars of an ADX correction unfolding from February to March 2011, with an 11.3% drawdown testing disciplined decision-making. Step through each session, weigh seven decision points, and receive an AI coach review of your choices in this simulated market-training exercise.

38K lines
7Decision points
1Difficulty
DailyGranularity

38 daily bars · 7 decision points · 2011-02 to 2011-03 · Stocks

Key facts

This window spans 54 days with a peak-to-trough drawdown of 11.3% and a 8.1% run-up.

Max drawdown
−11.3%
Max run-up
+8.1%
Duration
54 days
Largest single-day move
−3.3%
Bars
38 Daily bars
Decision points
7

Every figure above is computed programmatically from this replay’s own candle series — no editorial input, no LLM. Methodology: Methodology

How to play
  1. The market advances day by day. You only see candles up to the current day — as if you were really there.

  2. At key decision points choose Buy / Trim / Exit / Hold. Each decision advances the timeline by one day.

  3. After settlement you get a six-dimension score and an AI coach review. Your result enters the scenario leaderboard.

Event Replay

What happened — and what it teaches

The Abu Dhabi Securities Exchange entered a correction phase amid the heightened volatility of early 2011, when regional uncertainty was reshaping Gulf markets. This replay condenses 38 daily bars spanning February 3 to March 29, 2011, placing participants inside a compressed, high-stakes environment where seven decision points—three marked as critical—demanded careful navigation. The scenario asks: how would you manage risk when the market's direction is contested?

The index closed at 39.5 from an opening of 39.23, a net gain of just 0.7%—deceptively mild. Behind that narrow outcome lay an 11.3% maximum drawdown and single-bar swings reaching 3.3%, creating multiple moments where positions faced sharp adverse moves. Participants who reacted impulsively to intraday spikes likely amplified losses; those with disciplined frameworks had to decide when to hold, adjust, or exit.

This correction teaches that process matters more than prediction. The 11.3% drawdown underscores how corrections test a trader's tolerance for temporary losses and adherence to pre-defined risk limits. Seven decision points reward systematic evaluation over guesswork, while the 3.3% largest move highlights the psychological challenge of holding through volatility spikes. Surviving a correction requires both analytical rigor and emotional control—qualities this historical scenario is designed to develop.